More Questions than Answers
I have found that you can learn a lot about people and interpersonal relationships by watching or even participating in the relationships of others. This is one of the great reasons that it is good to have friends that are friends with each other. It brings out more about all the people you know.
One recent turn in all this great learning is learning from the mistakes of others. Sometimes, by being outside of the situation you can know things that the people in the situation won’t know. One way this works is that people are often more articulate and willing to articulate when you are outside of the situation, but care about it and know what is going on in the situation too.
All of these things are true for me now in one such situation. I have two pals, A and B, who are very close to each other and have a deep fraternal love of friendship for one another. It is awesome and inspiring to know them and see their love. Lately, though A has made a mistake. Here’s the rundown…
A has the following temporary qualities that contributed to A’s mistake.
–Attitude. A has downplayed something. This particular something happens to be important to B. Also, A is probably incorrect in A’s underestimation of the significance, impact, and difficulty of this something.
–Particular Immaturity. One of A’s personality quirks is that A has a hard time taking correction, hearing criticism, etc. (I have this same problem, so I am rather understanding, and furthermore I am tuned into the whole probem, because I don’t want my trait to cause this problem for me.) I call this a particular immaturity, because I want to emphasize that it is local to just one part of A, but I also want to emphasize that this is a quirk that can be ‘grown out of’ or ‘matured past’ at some point.
B has a few qualities contributing to the situation as well.
–Sensitive. B withdraws pretty quickly when hurt or disappointed. B has that particular something that was mentioned earlier and A downplayed it. Now B’s emotions are festering, because B would like to share B’s something with A, but doesn’t want it to be so insignificant to A.
–Reactionary. B tends to learn ‘too quickly.’ B quickly noted that A’s attitude toward the particular something and reacted accordingly. B also has ‘learned’ that A doesn’t take correction well. So, B reacts by not giving correction, and just to be safe, doesn’t even mention or attempt to explain the situation from a B perspective.
For me, the hard part of all of this is watching as these two friends grow apart over a single issue. Harder still is noticing how it tends to spiral out of control. The distance between them will grow almost exponentially, like compound interest or something, because these things continue a centrifugal push until something, some event, (or someone?) comes in to change things up a bit.
I would like to jump in and help, but I have a hard time doing that, because both people are contributing to the centrifugal energy. Sure I could talk to A about the attitude issue, which started the problem and fuels it, but A really doesn’t deal with that sort of thing well at all, and my efforts could be all for naught. Also, A will be the first to tell me that I could just as easily have gone to B to fix the problem. This seems true at first blush, but I feel like B is right about the particular something. It is important and shouldn’t be downplayed.
Well, I guess now my dilemma is over. I now know that I ultimately feel that A should make the first step, even though I think that they both contribute equally to this issue.
The sad part is that A loves B so much, and is usually so good about playing up things of even minimal importance. This trait of A’s is part of what caused me all the grief and reflection about this whole situation! See, I know that A finds many things to be important, and B is high among those many things. I believe that if A knew what was happening behind the scenes and in the undercurrents of this whole issue A would be utterly heartbroken that A had a part in this. A would be even more heart broken to realize what fun, closeness, and mutual joy and happiness A missed out on.
I also know that B really loves A. So much that B’s heart is broken, because B wanted to honor and love A concerning/about/with this particular something. B is so disappointed because even though B truly wants to honor A in this way, B can’t because A has removed the honor from the particular something with A’s attitude toward it. B is also heartbroken because B would settle for the closeness, and the mutual fun, happiness and joy with A, but that too is gone and is now impossible (unless by some twist of chance A changed A’s attitude.)
Ending Thoughts
Now that all this is explained I realize that most people will have no idea of what I am talking about, which is intentional, but I also think that some people will have gotten lost even in the abstract. I wish that wasn’t the case, because I’ve learned a lot from seeing all of this. I wish I could share it.
I’ve learned that my actions have powerful impacts on my relationships — probably beyond what I see or know.
I’ve learned that learning some lessons should never happen. Such lessons as “That’s impossible” or “He’ll never quit” or “I’ll always be miserable” aren’t really great lessons at all.
Finally, I’ve chosen to believe that this is another attempt at driving people apart. I believe that ultimately evil drives us all apart, but that good pulls us together in loving, harmonious relationships.
Posted by David under Reflections |
I had to read this a few times to figure out what on earth you were saying.
First, next time consider using fake names instead of letters. People will process names better than letters (you could make them a name that goes with both boys and girls if you wanted to keep genders a secret)
Second, you mentioned that you could intervene by going to A but then A will say, “why didn’t you go to B?” then you didn’t really give a good reason of why you don’t go to B even though you believe A should take the first step. I think you should go to B first according to what you’ve described in this little story.
My favorite thought is that you can learn a lot more about people in watching how they interact with others who are your friends. That idea had been extremely important to me for quite sometime, I just find that’s the best way to get to know people by watching them interact with others that you know. It’s also the best way to learn about yourself by listening to all these different people in the group and not just one person’s perception of you.
Third, “learning some lessons should never happen.” Those don’t seem like lessons, they seem like attitude problems. So I suppose I’m going to disagree with this statement. Then again I’m the type of person who would make a bad decision and suffer consequences to at least have the knowledge and experience of something that’s considered taboo or forbidden. So that contributes to me believing that all lessons and knowledge have great worth.
Since you took the time to explain this I imagine you care about the situation and the distance that’s drifting these two friends apart. If A doesn’t really understand B and realize there’s a problem, and B doesn’t want to explain it, then I guess nobody’s making a huge effort to reconcile this distance that maybe only you seem to notice. If A and B noticed the distance and both parties did’t like the distance, I’d imagine someone would try to do something about it. Unless of course the distance doesn’t really exist and you’ve been thinking about this way to much. Also perhaps the distance isn’t such a bad thing, after all many people have friends for only a season before they move on to a difference part of their lives and eventually lose touch due to the lack of common interests or experiences. Now if things haven’t been reconciled then I would think it’s good to get it out before you’d lose touch, but I suppose that’s too much effort and time for most people.
And now it’s 4:30 and I’m thinking I just wasted 30 minutes on this because who knows if any of it really matters since A’s not doing anything and B’s not doing anything and D’s not doing anything (you’re D). I gotta get back to work.
Comment by Jessica — September 24, 2005 @ 4:27 pm
This is one of the most convoluted ways i have seen a problem dealt with…saying that, it’s entertaining to try to untangle and figure out. It’s odd, cause I think I potentially might be person A, yet, to my obviously oblivious nature, I cannot be sure, and really see no reason why i would be (maybe a few inclinations, but i still can’t put my finger on it exactly).
Maybe this is really a trick, to make everyone who is associated with you feel like they might be person A….and therefore bringing about communication with all your friends. I mean, every person that feels like they haven’t done anything wrong could very well be person A…this whole thing makes even the innocent question themselves )or perhaps i’m the only one…)
So here is my plea…if I (Jenn Jula) am “your” person A…and you are my person B, please just let me know. It’s crazy that I downplayed something….but perhaps there is a good reason why, or maybe i’m just so self centered i couldn’t look past myself (there are many options for this). I am sorry person B.
Haha…wouldn’t it be funny if I was really person B…that would freak me out. Maybe I’m both person A and B! OH my!
Comment by JennyJ — September 25, 2005 @ 10:21 am
LOL, apologizing just to be safe. I love it!
Comment by Jessica — September 27, 2005 @ 9:38 pm
you know me JB…presumptious apologizing is so my style
Comment by JennyJ — September 28, 2005 @ 1:43 am
and also an inability to spell properly…that is also my style
Comment by JennyJ — September 28, 2005 @ 1:44 am
hmmm….well at least you know what you’re apologizing for now.
Comment by Jessica — September 28, 2005 @ 10:36 pm